A MAI-Day Alert
This May, the Multilateral Agreement on Investment, a business treaty being negotiated by the richer nations that make up the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), will be presented to the rest of the world's nations to sign, with little chance for amendments or additions. The MAI will be a blow against the environment and against the world's poor. It will give near-total freedom to foreign investors, effectively reducing the rights of host nations.
[ 63 ] [ 64 ] [ CONTENTS ] [ HOME ] [ 63G ] [ 63P ] [ Foot ]
Under MAI, participating nations must:
Remove requirements on investor behavior to merit market access
Compensate investors in full for assets expropriated by
"unreasonable" regulation or by seizure
Treat foreign investors as favorably as domestic ones
Allow investors to sue governments in any dispute resolution
Ensure that all levels of government comply with the MAI
Advocates argue that the MAI is needed to protect international investors
against discrimination and expropriation and will open new markets to investment.
Many others, however, contend
that it will encourage nations -- to an even greater degree than at present -- to compete for investors by lowering wages
and environmental safeguards. It will also allow investors to challenge safety and other regulations that might
inconvenience the unrestricted flow of capital. Critics see as particularly serious the likelihood that even more money will
flow out of poorer countries, whereas, at present, they may restrict the amount investors can withdraw. For this and other
reasons, the national debts of our world's poorest countries are sure to rise under the agreement.
Today, one in every five persons in the world is considered
extremely poor by the United Nations. Women are the majority in
that class. Children, the elderly, the disabled, migrants,
refugees and indigenous peoples, as well as those long out of
work, are other categories of the poorest. While the majority are
rural, many are moving to the cities for the new industrial jobs,
swelling poverty there and often leaving behind -- and further
impoverishing -- women and children.
Wherever and whenever they can, corporations will buy low
(paying third-world wages) and sell high (to first-world buyers).
Their profits on sales of cheap goods or resource result in huge
rewards of wealth, first to top management and then to
stockholders. The nations supplying the labor, resource or goods
gain little financially and consistently suffer social, economic
and environmental damage.
Cash incomes of transnational employees in less developed
nations may seem good at first, but costs of food, shelter,
transportation and other needs soon begin to outstrip wages.
Workers who flock to the cities are often entering the cash
economy for the first time. Everything that was obtained before
by gardening, sewing, weaving and bartering now costs money --
even water in some places.
Now, there is no such thing as
"getting by", picking local fruit, trading eggs for grain or
being cared for by neighbors or extended family. Many workers
have had to leave their families behind in rural villages and now
have no social support if they need any help.
Open all economic sectors, including real estate, broadcasting,
and natural resources, to foreign ownership
City laborers for big business often live in slums without
sewers, clean water or access to health centers, schools or
transportation. Labor conditions, even where good regulations are
ignored, can be unhealthy, inhumane and dangerous. In some
developing nations -- usually not the poorest -- workers may earn
more, save and raise their standards of living. Also,
transnational corporations sometimes contribute to schools,
health centers, roads and other community needs. But positive
examples of globalized industry, agriculture or worker
communities are very rare.
There are many hidden costs to the community, nation and the
world, including lost revenue (when corporations receive
subsidies or abatements), pollution, job health hazards, forests
destroyed for sprawled factories and houses or cheap export
timber, deserts created by over-farming and over-lumbering or
over-irrigation of more affordable sites, silted lakes and
rivers, et al. Indigenous peoples are especially vulnerable.
Since 1945, when the UN was started, global Gross National Product (GNP) has
increased 700%; global per capita income, 300%. Yet, the 48
poorest nations, with 10% of the world's population, have only
one tenth of one percent of the world's income. Their average per
capita income in 1993 was $300 -- less than a dollar a day,
compared to $906 for the developing world as a whole, and $21,593
for most of the developed nations.
South Asia has the largest number of poor people but half of
all Africans and many East Europeans are also poor. The United
States and Western Europe have only 1% of the world's poor -- but
that is 15% of their populations. Developed countries have 34
million people out of work.
And the most wretched of the earth's nations and people are
getting poorer. In 1960, the richest fifth of the world's
population had 30 times more income than the poorest fifth. By
1991, the gap had more than doubled, the richest fifth having 61
times more income than the poorest fifth.
To call world attention to the tragic and dangerous crisis
of poverty, the UN has designated the next ten years, 1997-2006,
the "First International Decade for the Eradication of Poverty".
October 17, the day the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was
signed in 1948, has been chosen as the day, each year, when
nations and groups worldwide protest against poverty as a
violation of human rights and show what they are doing to help
eradicate it.
UN studies and declarations agree that poverty is linked to
lack of control over resources, especially unequal access to
land. The UN world conference on
Habitat, which took place June 1996, in Istanbul, recommended the recapture of speculative gains
in land values through local taxes in order to alleviate poverty
and increase affordable housing. Real estate generally becomes
more valuable as population grows and as communities improve
themselves.
Therefore, "recapture" is an accurate term since
rising land value is presently being captured mostly by those who
do little to increase its value. Their business is simply to
anticipate such rises, then monopolize land parcels until they
can sell them and reap high returns on their investments while
depriving others of the use of land at affordable prices.
Unfortunately, references to the problems created by
transnational corporations, the World
Trade Organisation
(WTO) and others are few and weak
in most
UN commitments and resolutions. Sadly, the MAI will
probably even receive official endorsement by the UN.
Reform groups call poverty a human rights violation. In The
Crime of Poverty, American economist and philospher, Henry George
wrote, "The crime...the meanness born of
poverty...poison(s)...the very air which rich and poor alike must
breathe...There is one sufficient cause that is common to all
nations; and that is the appropriation, as the property of some,
of that natural element on which and from which all must live."
That "natural element" is
land. All nations, 185 countries,
rich and poor, must realize that the appropriation of land and
its resources by "some" results in poverty, endangers the
environment and peace, and so threatens to poison "the very air
which rich and poor alike must breathe." Want more information? E-mail to:
vasic@un.org -- Pat Aller©, December 4, 1997
Also see MAI-Not! at: http://mai.flora.org/ Postal: The MAI-Not! Project, OPIRG- Carleton (Ontario Public Interest Research Group), 1125 Colonel By Dr., Room 326, Unicentre, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada. Tel (613) 520-2757, Fax (613) 520-3989, E-mail OPIRG at opirg@carleton.ca
| . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |