|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOBART (Tas) Australia: Table 5.2 shows the institutions and homes that were specifically named in the Review and the number of claimants who reported incidents of abuse in them. It should be noted that there were many other facilities in the period of the Review that were not named by claimants. Also, a number of claimants had more than one placement. DHHS: Rochebank Hostel Abermere Hostel Casablanca Gilburn Malmesbury Laroona Omaru Ashley Home for Boys Wybra Hall West Winds Boys' Home Weeroona Girls' Training Centre Salvation Army: Barrington Boys' Home Maylands Girls' Home Catholic Church: Mt St Canice (Magdalen Home) Boys' Town (Savio College) St Josephs Orphanage/ Aikenhead House (later St Josephs Child Care Centres) Churches of Christ: Bethany Anglican Church: Clarendon Children's Home Community Board of Management: Kennerley Boys Home (later Kennerley Children's Home) Northern Tasmanian Home for Boys (also known as Glenara Children's Home Glendel Children's HomeMost of the allegations relating to these institutions were of sustained physical and emotional abuse and, while they were established to cope with difficult boys which may help to explain the strictness and severity of the discipline regimes, there can be no excuse for the reports of sadistic and inhumane physical punishment that allegedly took place. Allegations of sexual abuse were less common in the boys' homes and there is evidence to suggest that some of the reported sexual abuse was perpetrated by older boys on younger boys. (p 16 / 27) Several institutions for girls have also been named often, although to a lesser extent than the boys' homes. These are: Female claimants mostly complained of sustained emotional and physical abuse, but there were also instances of sexual abuse reported. [...] During the 1960s in particular, it is apparent that corporal punishment was prevalent. Claimants indicated that cruel punishments were handed out irrationally and that they often did not know why they were being punished. According to claimants, corporal punishment was administered by a variety of instruments depending on the preference of the alleged perpetrator: Claimants have advised that Magadalen was commonly known as a home for ‘naughty girls', who were sometimes pregnant when they came into care. Magdalen Home was also used by Police when they picked up 'wayward girls' from the streets. One claimant described the institution as prison like, having bars on the windows, locked doors and nuns carrying keys on their belts. Examples of abuse cited by the claimants in Catholic run institutions included: There were favourable comments made about Mt St Canice and the kindness of some nuns. In the course of the Review, two former residents of the home contacted the Ombudsman's office to describe how happy their time at Mt St Canice had been. There were no allegations of sexual abuse reported. (p 23 / 34) 5.4 HOMES RUN BY CHURCH AUTHORITIES Reference has already been made above to a number of Approved Children's Homes run by churches. Further comment is provided here in deference to the high level of public interest and concern following recent disclosures in relation to sexual abuse by clergy. Church authorities have been advised of the allegations made against them. As Table 5.3 below indicates, 62 claimants (25 per cent of the total) reported abuse in church run Homes. Most of the complaints were made against the Catholic Church followed by the Salvation Army. Given that these were the largest homes, the number of abuse incidents reported is consistent. The allegations related mostly to serious physical and emotional abuse but there were 17 separate incidents of sexual abuse alleged, mostly at Barrington Boys' Home, Maylands Girls' Home, at Boys' Town and St Joseph's Orphanage/Aikenhead House. No sexual abuse claims were received in respect of Mt St Canice. One allegation of sexual abuse related to the Bethany Children's Home, run by the Churches of Christ. This abuse was allegedly committed by another child and not by a carer. There were no allegations of sexual abuse against the Anglican Church. Table 5.3: Approved Children's Homes run by Churches and named in the Review No of claimants Salvation Army: Barrington Boys Home 16 Maylands Girl's Home 7 Churches of Christ: Bethany Children's Home 1 Anglican: Clarendon Children's Home 2 Catholic: Mt St Canice (Convent of the Good Shepherd; Magdalen Home) 13 Boys Town (Savio College) 9 St Joseph's Orphanage /Aikenhead House 14(p 23 / 34) 5.5 FOSTER CARE PLACEMENTS (p 24 / 35) 5.6 ALLEGATIONS OF SEXUAL ABUSE Two thirds (154) of the claimants alleged that they had been sexually abused at some time. Allegations ranged from vaginal and anal intercourse, often described as ‘rape' by claimants, through to inappropriate touching and fondling. Most of the allegations involved the more serious forms of sexual abuse. Table 5.5 below shows that one in four of all reported incidents of abuse was of a sexual nature. [192, 24%] (p 25 / 36) Her foster parents took her to a holiday house owned by their friend. She thinks they arrived about mid afternoon. The friend asked her to come with him to the tractor shed where he had sexual intercourse with her. She was crying and he told her not to say anything. She didn't complain to her foster parents because they were friends of the other man. She was about 12 years old at the time. She got on reasonably well with her foster parents in the beginning. Her foster father was very good to her and told her on a number of occasions that he loved her. When she was about 14 years old he started having sexual intercourse with her about twice a week. She used to cry and tell him that she didn't want to do it anymore. He would give her money each time he had sex with her. He (a religious) would come into the dormitory after the boys were asleep. He would place his hand over his mouth and wake him up. Then he would take off his pyjama trousers and stroke his penis. He was too scared to tell anyone. He knows that he did it to other boys too. (p 26 / 37) 6.1 FAILURE TO PROTECT ALL CHILDREN It is evident that over the period covered by the Review, child protection systems in Tasmania, as elsewhere, have not adequately protected all of the children entrusted to the care of the State. There is no reason to believe that systems prior to the Review period were any better. The Government has addressed the issue by initiating the Review and offering redress to victims of past abuse. The many shocking stories presented to the Review team of vulnerable children abused by the people legally responsible for their care suggest that the Government's decision to offer redress is warranted. The Review ran from 14 July 2003 to 31 March 2004. (p 34 / 45) 6.3 CONCERN RELATED TO FOSTER CARE A disturbing finding to emerge from the Review which requires further examination relates to claims from 12 young adults, presently in the 20 to 30 age range, who have made allegations of abuse having commenced since 1990, in one case as recently as 1998. Nine of these claims related to foster care homes and eight of the claimants were young women. In most cases, the abuse was allegedly ongoing and involved more than one offender. (p 35 / 46) 6.7 LOST OPPORTUNITIES Regret for lost opportunities was a recurring theme in the interviews. Many people, who are now mature adults, are still bitter about their lost childhoods; many have no photographs of their parents or siblings; no records of small achievements; and no memorabilia of happy holidays, birthdays, or other important events. (p 37 / 48) 6.8 BREAKING THE CYCLE OF ABUSE A very disturbing finding from the Review was that in some families sexual abuse appears to have been accepted as ‘normal'. A total of 13 claims were made involving members of two separate families. The claims involved intergenerational abuse. Some of the claimants were apparently unaware that other family members had lodged separate claims. It was also apparent from the Review that the commonly held belief that people who were abused as children will often abuse their own children has substance. Numbers of claimants admitted to this. 6.9 ABORIGINAL CLAIMANTS Forty people included in the Review claimed Aboriginality, comprising 16 per cent of the total. The proportion is higher than in the Tasmanian population as a whole, but consistent with the higher incidence of Aboriginals in care generally, which may reflect judgmental issues of the time as to the standards of care which were provided in Aboriginal families. Five family groups are represented involving 15 claimants. Many of the claimants have linked their claims to past practices associated with the ‘stolen generation' and lament what they regard as the deliberate alienation from their Aboriginal heritage. File records show that in each case the children were taken into care for stated reasons of ‘neglect' rather than for reasons associated with the precepts underpinning the stolen generation movement. (p 38 / 49) |
|
Justice Anne Burke Photo: CNS |
SHANNON AGE: My sister and I both were raped, on both of our Communion days. He told us we were dressed as God's brides. He was God's man, and only he could show us God's love. It was as if, in his eyes, it was our wedding night.
SUE ARCHIBALD (The Linkup): What's unique about The Farm is that it's the first place survivors of clergy abuse can go that really is their own.
RAY COPPOLA (Psychotherapist): In the process of using a bunch of different exercises and structured activities, it's like an inquiry into the self. In the course of telling their stories and experiencing each others' stories, it's as if their stories massage each other. They come to look at their relation to their story in a different way. So that if one goes into the heart of the wound, it's possible one can actually discover a gift.
The Pope said Bishops should pray for an increase in vocations
|
|
INTENTION: A challenge to RELIGIONS to PROTECT CHILDREN. Click for more explanation. |
|
To SEARCH only ONE WEBPAGE AT A TIME, you may use the built-in features of your own Browser. With most systems press
[Ctrl] + F. This will cause a Find or Find/Replace dialogue box, or a Search/Replace box, to appear. (With some old programmes, start by pressing [Ctrl] + [Shift] + F. However, if your system requires it, click Edit, then click Find.) Type in a keyword, and press [Enter], or click Find Next, or Find, or Search.
To SEARCH all of This Site, use the special panel provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||